Gilles Beauchamp
Nouvel article sur la dimension épistémique du privilège et de la discrimination en matière religieuse. L’article permet, entre autres, de jeter un regard critique sur l’interdiction des signes religieux dans la fonction publique québécoise. L’article est publié dans le Journal of Applied Philosophy.
Résumé:
In banning religious symbols for civil servants in a position of authority, Québec’s laicity law disproportionately burdens religious minorities. Nevertheless, politicians seem to somehow avoid this problem, and the law is largely supported by the population. This insensitivity to religious discrimination calls for an explanation. I argue that part of the explanation for this unequal treatment of religion in secular society lies in active religious ignorance. Drawing a parallel from how white ignorance functions to protect racial inequalities, I argue that a kind of active ignorance in the religious domain – which I name post-Christendom ignorance – makes it difficult to comprehend alternative understandings of religious experience and allows the majority to deny its religious positionality. Applying this framework, I criticize Québec’s laicity law for wrongfully relying on inadequate hermeneutical resources about religion. Further, the failure to see that targeting only religious symbols worn by individuals is discriminatory is the result of the epistemic vice of closed-mindedness. This article aims to show how religious persons in secular society can suffer hermeneutical wrongs because of their religious identity, and it aims to show that this injustice in the epistemic domain can help explain the unequal treatment of religious minorities while providing grounds for criticism.
Pour lire l’article (disponible en libre accès)
